Benefactor robinjojo Posted March 29 · Benefactor Benefactor Share Posted March 29 From today's Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2024/mar/29/bolivia-shipwreck-colombia-treasure 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benefactor kirispupis Posted March 29 · Benefactor Benefactor Share Posted March 29 What a mess. My vote goes for Colombia owning the wreck. The standard these days is where the artifacts were found and these are in Colombian waters. I don't believe Spain has much of a claim because If so, then every Athens tet found in Turkey should belong to Greece. Similarly, any Kyzikos stater found in the Aegean should be returned to Turkey. Colombia as a nation didn't exist at the time, and the whole of the country was owned by Spain. Therefore, if the argument is true that the shipwreck should belong to Spain because it flew at the time under the Spanish flag, then most of South America and Mexico should also be returned to Spain. The argument from the indigenous people is admirable, but I don't see this money grab working. If this were true, then not just this treasure but every Spanish coin minted from the Potosi mines should also be returned to them. The best situation they can hope for is the lawsuit publicizes how much the native Bolivians suffered at those mines. 4 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benefactor robinjojo Posted March 29 · Benefactor Author Benefactor Share Posted March 29 (edited) I tend to agree. At best an agreement with the indigenous groups might be reached whereby they receive a percentage of the revenue from any sale that the Colombian government raises from the sale of any of the coins that they own from the San Jose. It is a solution, probably half-baked, but better than nothing. Here's more information on life in Potosi during the silver boom, which lasted centuries, albeit drastically diminishing by the by the end of the 18th century. https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/mar/21/story-of-cities-6-potosi-bolivia-peru-inca-first-city-capitalism#:~:text=to western Europe.-,At its peak in the early 17th century%2C 160%2C000 native,or Seville at the time. Edited March 29 by robinjojo 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benefactor DonnaML Posted March 29 · Benefactor Benefactor Share Posted March 29 (edited) I agree with @kirispupis and @robinjojo. Although I'm not quite clear on what it is that the indigenous group wants to happen. Leave the wreck where it is? Sell it for the benefit of the indigenous community? Or do they simply want a say in how the objects are exhibited? Here's a print I own from 1683, by Alain Manesson Mallet, of the "Montagne de Potosi," from his book "Description de l'Univers." Part of my collection of antique maps and prints dating back to the 16th century. Edited March 29 by DonnaML 5 1 1 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benefactor robinjojo Posted March 29 · Benefactor Author Benefactor Share Posted March 29 It seems to me that the indigenous groups are seeking a financial share in any sales of the San Jose salvage, whenever that occurs. The details are murky. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DLTcoins Posted March 30 · Member Share Posted March 30 Déjà vu: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/feb/01/treasure-trove-galleon-returned-spain 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.