Topcat7 Posted August 19, 2023 · Member Posted August 19, 2023 (edited) Circa 168-167 B.C. MACEDON, Amphipolis, under Roman Rule. Time of Lucius Aemilius Paullus Æ21.6. (Gaius Puplilius, quaestor), . Obv: Helmeted head of Roma right Rev: MAKEΔONΩN TAMIOΥ ΓAIOΥ ΠOΠΛIΛIOΥ (MACEDON, QUAESTOR GAIUS PUPLILIUS) in three lines within oak wreath. Ref: BMC 72; SNG Copenhagen 1320. 10.58g, 21.6mm, Edited August 19, 2023 by Topcat7 12 Quote
red_spork Posted August 20, 2023 · Member Posted August 20, 2023 This is a great example of this type, much nicer than the lesser example of the type I owned years ago. I sold my "quaestor" bronzes but I still have this nice example of the type that seemed to follow them and is often overstruck on the "quaestor" bronzes, as is this example (see 9-12 obverse for the back of Romas helmet): Macedon under Roman Rule. Uncertain official(traditionally, D. Junius Silanus), Æ25 (9.96g), 167-165 BC. Facing mask of Silenos, wearing ivy wreath / MAKE/ΔONΩN in two lines, D above; all within oak wreath. MacKay, "Bronze Coinage In Macedonia, 168-166 BC," ANSMN 14 (1968), pl.III, 10; SNG Copenhagen 1324. Overstruck on a quaestor bronze of Gaius Publilius or Lucius Fulcinnius as evidenced by the Roma obverse undertype remnants at 9-12 o clock obverse Privately purchased from NeroNumi via Vcoins, 10 June 2022, ex Gorny & Mosch Giessener Münzhandlung Auction 220, 11 March 2014, 1249 8 Quote
NewStyleKing Posted August 20, 2023 · Member Posted August 20, 2023 On 8/19/2023 at 11:33 AM, Topcat7 said: Circa 168-167 B.C. MACEDON, Amphipolis, under Roman Rule. Time of Lucius Aemilius Paullus Æ21.6. (Gaius Puplilius, quaestor), . Obv: Helmeted head of Roma right Rev: MAKEΔONΩN TAMIOΥ ΓAIOΥ ΠOΠΛIΛIOΥ (MACEDON, QUAESTOR GAIUS PUPLILIUS) in three lines within oak wreath. Ref: BMC 72; SNG Copenhagen 1320. 10.58g, 21.6mm, Very much in the flavour of the Lucullian Pseudo-Athenian NewStyles with monograms. These monograms have been decoded to read Lucullus Tamioy cf above. I have no doubt that Robinson's unravelling is correct and Lucullus was basically echoing this Roman Makadonon type and the Aesillas type which had some precedent and thus acceptable. 3 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.