Jump to content

Unknown byzantine coin


Tesauros

Recommended Posts

Hello, some time ago i encountered this coin online, cant find the original site but downloaded the photo. Would anyone by able to tell what kind of coin it is? Silver and the weight should be 3g. Propably Andronikos II. or Andronikos III. Palailogos?.

Thank you very much for any information 

0006_g.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, TheTrachyEnjoyer said:

fake of a tornese

Hello, what makes you think its a fake? It looks well struck, the detail is also fine overall i believe its a period coin but of unknown origin. Thank you very much and have a nice day. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tesauros said:

Hello, what makes you think its a fake? It looks well struck, the detail is also fine overall i believe its a period coin but of unknown origin. Thank you very much and have a nice day. 

Difficult to explain other than everything about the style of this coin is wrong. I have never once seen a coin plated in any work look like this. Having handled thousands of coins from this era and soent significant time sifting through sales archives, I am unaware of any genuine example like this. Find an example like it in an institution…you wont. Dont presume odd style indicates an imitative origin. It could just as well be fake (as is the case here).

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, TheTrachyEnjoyer said:

Difficult to explain other than everything about the style of this coin is wrong. I have never once seen a coin plated in any work look like this. Having handled thousands of coins from this era and soent significant time sifting through sales archives, I am unaware of any genuine example like this. Find an example like it in an institution…you wont. Dont presume odd style indicates an imitative origin. It could just as well be fake (as is the case here).

A coin not being in museum or other establishment does not neccesary mean its a fake, in my country i handled coins that are known in 1 or 2 examples that not even museums have. I tend to think its a imitation or unofficial issue rather than a fake. Thank you everyone for the insight. Lovely forum i discovered 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tesauros said:

A coin not being in museum or other establishment does not neccesary mean its a fake, in my country i handled coins that are known in 1 or 2 examples that not even museums have. I tend to think its a imitation or unofficial issue rather than a fake. Thank you everyone for the insight. Lovely forum i discovered 

No offense but if you think this coin is genuine, I can’t and won’t take your opinions on late Byzantine numismatics seriously. It might be the worst fake tornese I have seen

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a moment to write this now:

Why is this tornese fake?

STYLE

To the untrained eye, this will not be apparent. However, once you have handled these coins long enough it becomes the easiest indicator of all. Yes, Byzantine coins are crude. No, that does not mean style varied. Byzantine coins are uniform in design and easily grouped together. Extreme attention to detail was paid to every one of the coins. Style does not vary from a series of coins issued at the same mint. It is remarkably consistent. 

D094713E-30EF-4FBB-AAF5-1852644A450A.jpeg.df243f42a85c53bbfd97f1cb03d5db3e.jpeg

Your coin is awful is this regard. The Emperor is executed in horrendous fashion with a style so far from the normal issues that it is laughable. 

0FAF4A41-8E89-4180-9C86-3059198D91A7.jpeg.99c3758717598e8fd5e7c3db2eaaa1a8.jpegD4592875-E42E-4521-8E26-3BD475A12FA0.jpeg.97eb7775668d13f27cef2aae9ee7dfab.jpeg6DF4E589-BB9E-4359-9750-E20D21A5E920.jpeg.2e3ba0b8fa384babe4d8e5a3a6c91c09.jpeg

 

REGALIA AND ICONOGRAPHY

Here is an area where Byzantine mint workers paid the utmost attention. Divitision? Loros? Maniakion? Orarion? Chlamys?

Your modern faker won’t understand what any of these are or mean. The Byzantine mint engraver certainly did. Why does your early 13th century tornese have a loros on a tornese of Andronikos II….and underneath what appears to be the worst attempted depiction of the chlamys I have seen? This is an impossibility. Why are your pendilia represented in a fashion not seen on these tornses? Why does the stemma have a cross?

Where is the Manus Dei? Did the engraver forget that too? Why are there stars above the legend? Did the engraver decide to add extra details for the fun of it? I will not begin to discuss the reverse because I believe my point is made abundantly clear already…but believe me that has as many issues or more

 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Benefactor

@Tesauros you have just heard from some of the best people I know for post 1204 Byzantine coinage, @TheTrachyEnjoyer and @Glebe. I would not take their answers lightly, neither are being rude and neither likes disappointing a collector.

Put the coin aside and as you continue to collect you will see their point of view.  In the meantime, please post whatever you have questions on and of course new finds, we all like to learn. 

Simon

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...