Filat Posted February 9, 2023 · Member Share Posted February 9, 2023 Tetradrachma 1. в синих кругах мы видим лишь малую часть пузырьков воздуха, которые не лопнули, в процессе литья данного изделия. → 1. in the blue circles we see only a small part of the air bubbles that did not burst during the casting of this product. 2. в желтых кругах мы видим лишь малую часть пузырьков воздуха, которые лопнули, в процессе литья данного изделия. → 2. in the yellow circles, we see only a small part of the air bubbles that burst during the casting of this product. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Filat Posted February 9, 2023 · Member Author Share Posted February 9, 2023 Tetradrachma в зеленых кругах мы видим лишь малую часть пузырьков воздуха, которые лопнули, в процессе литья данного изделия. → in green circles, we see only a small part of the air bubbles that burst during the casting of this product. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaleun96 Posted February 9, 2023 · Member Share Posted February 9, 2023 36 minutes ago, Filat said: Tetradrachma в зеленых кругах мы видим лишь малую часть пузырьков воздуха, которые лопнули, в процессе литья данного изделия. → in green circles, we see only a small part of the air bubbles that burst during the casting of this product. These are not air bubbles. Not every coin is cast. These are likely products of silver corrosion, such as horn silver. Possibly some of them are where the surface layer of silver has been corroded away, leaving a discoloured pitted surface. You aren't familiar with die rust, you're not familiar with corrosion, you're not familiar with dust on coins, you're not familiar with how lighting interacts with a coin's surface producing different shadows or specular highlights, so what are you familiar with? Some coins you "analyse" may indeed be fake but not for the reasons you state. Until you actually know what you are doing, please refrain from posting fakes because you are condemning some perfectly good coins for no reason. 6 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewStyleKing Posted February 9, 2023 · Member Share Posted February 9, 2023 (edited) Kaleun96 is 100% correct! Both these "holy" NewStyles are absolutely genuine. Edited February 9, 2023 by NewStyleKing 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AussieCollector Posted February 9, 2023 · Member Share Posted February 9, 2023 Sigh. Can we please keep it to the topic, and not play the person. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts