Magnus Maximus Posted October 25, 2022 · Member Share Posted October 25, 2022 (edited) Hello all, I recently purchased this piece at a budget auction house. This coin is a common one and was minted from 383-388 at Nicomedia, Anatolia. What makes this coin interesting to me is that most AE-2's(decargryii) weigh between 4 and 5.5 grams, however this piece is a heafty 6.48 grams! Another point of intrest is that most of us collectors tend to refer to the large size bronze coins from 378-395 as AE-2's, however the Theodosian Code likley gives us the name of the denomination. Theodosian Code 9.23.2: “We command that only the centenionalis nummus shall be handled in public use and that the larger money shall be abolished. No person, therefore, shall dare to exchange the decargyrus nummus for another, and he shall know that the aforesaid money, which can be seized if found in public use, will be vindicated to the fisc.” Please post your Decargyrii coins! Edited October 25, 2022 by Magnus Maximus 12 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roman Collector Posted October 25, 2022 · Patron Share Posted October 25, 2022 And ruling in the west alongside Theodosius I in the east was Gratian, for whom the eastern mints also struck coins alongside those of their emperor: Gratian, AD 367-383. Roman Æ 2 (maiorina; decargyrus), 5.90 g, 21.4 mm, 11 h. Constantinople, AD 383. Obv: D N GRATIA-NVS P F AVG, helmeted, draped and cuirassed bust, right, holding spear and shield. Rev: GLORIA RO-MANORVM, Emperor standing facing, head right, on ship, raising right hand. Victory seated at helm. No wreath in field; in exergue, CONΓ. Refs: RIC 52a (unlisted officina). 10 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topcat7 Posted October 25, 2022 · Member Share Posted October 25, 2022 (edited) Some of my 'decargryii' of Theodosius I Theodosius I 4,34 g 25 mm RIC IX. Heraclea 24b(delta) (9) THEODOSIUS I 4.6gm 28mm RIC IX. Cyzicus 25b Edited October 25, 2022 by Topcat7 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topcat7 Posted October 25, 2022 · Member Share Posted October 25, 2022 (edited) SAnd some more of my 'decargryii' of Theodosius I THEODOSIUS I 5.3gm, 22mm RIC IX Antioch 68a THEODOSIUS I 5.6gm, 23.5mm RIC II 37(d) Edited October 25, 2022 by Topcat7 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnus Maximus Posted October 26, 2022 · Member Author Share Posted October 26, 2022 (edited) Very nice coins posted so far. Here are more coins of the denomination, that I own. Arcadius. A.D. 383-395 Condition: Very Fine Weight: 4.72g Diameter: 22mm Honorius. A.D. 393-395 Condition: Very Fine Weight: 3.94g Diameter: 20mm Edited October 26, 2022 by Magnus Maximus 11 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orange Julius Posted October 26, 2022 · Member Share Posted October 26, 2022 (edited) Great coins! I love when I get the chance to post these later ones. Edited October 26, 2022 by Orange Julius 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valentinian Posted October 26, 2022 · Member Share Posted October 26, 2022 For a list of all the types and their emperors, see the RIC IX site: http://augustuscoins.com/ed/ricix/ Scroll down a bit to see the reverse types and click on the images to see more about each. Here is one example of Type 20 on that site. 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nerosmyfavorite68 Posted October 26, 2022 · Member Share Posted October 26, 2022 Cool thread! I only have 2 or three of this denomination, none photographed. Ones a worn Magnus Maximus and the other a corroded Alexandria Theodosius, both obtained very early on. Any idea what the slightly earlier AE1 was called? Why were the larger coins demonetized? One suspects it has to do with inflation, but why keep the tiniest denomination? I would also suspect that some of these circulated beyond 395. Many of these coins are found quite worn. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shanxi Posted October 26, 2022 · Supporter Share Posted October 26, 2022 The term "Decargyrus" is new for me, interesting. Aelia Flacilla Syria, Antiochia, AE2 Obv.: AEL FLACCILLA AVG , Draped bust right Rev.: SALVS REI PVBLICAE Aelia Flacilla standing facing head right, ANTE Ae, 5.55g, 21.7mm Ref.: RIC.62 pl. 14/17 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prieure de Sion Posted October 26, 2022 · Member Share Posted October 26, 2022 7 hours ago, Valentinian said: For a list of all the types and their emperors, see the RIC IX site: http://augustuscoins.com/ed/ricix/ Scroll down a bit to see the reverse types and click on the images to see more about each. Here is one example of Type 20 on that site. Ouuuh! That’s a nice colorization with Patina and the Coin. Nice. Like this coin. 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnus Maximus Posted October 26, 2022 · Member Author Share Posted October 26, 2022 11 hours ago, Nerosmyfavorite68 said: Any idea what the slightly earlier AE1 was called? Why were the larger coins demonetized? One suspects it has to do with inflation, but why keep the tiniest denomination? I would also suspect that some of these circulated beyond 395. Many of these coins are found quite worn. I’m not sure what the official name for the large AE-1 that Julian II began is during was called. Kenneth W Harl, in his book “Coinage and the Roman Economy, states that the AE-1 was a billon coin and it’s demonetization in 367/8 allowed the Emperors Valentinian I and Valens to increase the silver purity of the siliqua. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ominus1 Posted October 26, 2022 · Supporter Share Posted October 26, 2022 ....by jove i DO have a pic o me Theo's...:D...fine thread and coins Peeps...:) 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.