Here's a used-to-own coin (a Phraates II tet from Parthia - since sold off), with my favorite bit of bizarreness from ancient numismatics. I wrote about it some years ago at that other place that most of us recently migrated from.
My former coin (and my photography), above, don't quite do the bizarreness justice, so here are a couple spotted online that make the oddity clearer. Take a good look at the renditions of Tyche...a detail is provided to assist.
As Vesta Sarkhosh Curtis points out in Religious Iconography on Ancient Iranian Coins, "The religious iconography of the Hellenistic Tyche figure was clearly unfamiliar to the Arsacid court and the (Parthian) die engraver at the end of the second century BC, as otherwise the attributes of a female goddess would not have been used for a clearly male figure."As CNG states it, "The god depicted on the reverse of these tetradrachms appears on no other Parthian coin, and apparently nowhere else...Such a representation of a transgender pantheistic deity is very unusual in ancient art. One wonders if the artist...simply misunderstood the types he was copying."https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=131058
The Parthians had supplanted the Seleukids in that part of Western Asia and, at least early on, tried to copy the regional Greek archetypes for the coinage. The Parthian engravers working on these early tets were no doubt referencing Seleukid coin reverses like the Tyches of Demetrios I Soter and the Zeuses of Alexander I Balas. Whether they intended a mash-up, or whether what resulted was, as CNG suggests, based on a misunderstanding - who knows? But it is bizarre!