Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I took a chance with this one.

Domitian achieved tribunician power for the 16th time on 14 September 96 AD. He was assassinated in a palace plot four days later on 18 September. In between those two dates the mint struck only one issue of denarii recording Domitian as TR P XVI, needless to say they are extremely rare! The Senate decreed Damnatio Memoriae within a day of Domitian's assassination which would have quickly halted production at the mint for his coinage. I believed this coin to be one of those elusive TR P XVI denarii. Read below to find out why I was wrong. 😞

 

 

D789(2).jpg.f281385ea599e1ed7d428fb02a63792c.jpg
Domitian
AR Denarius, 2.96g
Rome mint, 95-96 AD
Obv: IMP CAES DOMIT AVG GERM P M TR P XV; Head of Domitian, laureate, bearded, r.
Rev: IMP XXII COS XVII CENS P P P; Minerva stg. l., with thunderbolt and spear, shield at her l. side (M3)
RIC 789 (C2). BMC 234. RSC 291. BNC 208.
Acquired from Aegean, January 2024.

 

I purchased this coin on a hunch that this could possibly could be RIC 819 due to a reverse die match with the Paris TR P XVI specimen (BNC 213) and crucially what appears to be a 'I' engraved above the 'V'. Unfortunately, in hand the mystery numeral is just a die flaw. At least I didn't pay too much for it!

Do you have a numismatic 'mistake'? Misery loves company, I'd love to see it. 🙂

Thank you for looking!

Edited by David Atherton
  • Like 9
  • Cry 9
  • Gasp 1
  • Shock 1
Posted

Too bad! But it was worth the chance. At least, as you say, it wasn't very expensive.

I'll admit I once put a bid on what probably should have been an obvious fake, but thankfully (for me, anyway) I was outbid at the last moment. Described thus by the auction house:

DOMITIAN (Caesar, 69-81). Sestertius. Rome.

Weight : 19.03 gr
Diameter : 32 mm

3634911_1672739217(1).jpg.e1afffd41335e2d18d5f1c60d4b4af7d.jpg


 

  • Like 6
  • Cry 1
  • Gasp 1
Posted

@CPK - that was indeed an obvious fake. I was also initially thrilled about the idea of an unlisted Domitian sestertius. After a quick check and a confirmation from the specialists... it was pretty clear. 

I don't think I made too many mistakes or at least I like to think this. But here is a recent one that was a little different than what I was expecting. 

image.png.37747283e6650d83869499f6ea42bc4d.png

When seeing this I instantly remembered the type was discussed by our Faustina specialist. What I remembered - "a rare Faustina type". What it actually was - "the most common and popular Faustina denarius". Oh well. I do not regret this at all as the coin is beautiful and it was not expensive. 

  • Like 11
Posted

It sure as heck looks like an extra I above the V! Is that a feature in the handful of known coins?

I made the cardinal sin of bidding not entirely sober on this one - totally missed that it was a fourree until it hammered! Thought it was horn silver, nor copper. Thankfully all the other bidders had their wits, so I won it at a reasonable price for a fourree of a nice issue.

Domitianfourreedenariusseculargames.jpg.3c5cbd51da091c6c4f40ccda44a0f974.jpg

  • Like 8
Posted
1 hour ago, Finn235 said:

It sure as heck looks like an extra I above the V! Is that a feature in the handful of known coins?

I made the cardinal sin of bidding not entirely sober on this one - totally missed that it was a fourree until it hammered! Thought it was horn silver, nor copper. Thankfully all the other bidders had their wits, so I won it at a reasonable price for a fourree of a nice issue.

Domitianfourreedenariusseculargames.jpg.3c5cbd51da091c6c4f40ccda44a0f974.jpg

IMHO, that is a pretty nifty mistake. You don't see plated examples of that type very often!

  • Like 1
  • Yes 1
  • Benefactor
Posted

I purchased this coin because I felt reasonably confident at the time I could place it at Myrmekion due to its similarity with the types of Pantikapaion and Phanagoria.

Myos-Mytilene.jpg.ac6ece985de54f2ae637e6467798be3f.jpg

Ionia, Myos
c. 3rd century BCE
Æ 9mm, 1.22g, 9h
Turreted female head r. R/
Bow and arrow.
Imhoof, KM p. 90, 3

 

However, after further investigation I determined this to be not possible. It's still an interesting coin, though, and I currently suspect it may belong to Mytilene.

  • Like 4
Posted

I screwed up when buying this Bactrian drachm of Eucratides. The details are nice, but it doesn't fit in my collecting interests, and it is crystallized.  I will probably sell it if anyone is interested in it. idk I like it but idk is crystallization like a death sentence for silvers like bronze disease for coppers? The thing is if it wasn't crystallized it would have been like a $500+ coin.

IMG_1109.jpg

IMG_1112 (1).jpg

IMG_1110 (1).jpg

  • Like 4

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...