Julius Germanicus Posted December 10, 2022 · Member Share Posted December 10, 2022 This was a "back to the roots" purchase for me: a nice big yellow Sestertius that cost me just 5 % of what I paid for my Agrippina Junior and nevertheless is much nicer in hand - the reverse has suffered from corrosion, but the obverse leaves little to be desired I think!Note that the roman mint never reached this level of quality control for AE coinage again: this coin is not only round, well struck, and obviously made of "pure" yellow Orichalcum, it's weight is also 100 % spot on: exactly 27,2 grams equaling one roman ounce, the nominal weight of a Sestertius! Show me a coin of Marcus Aurelius (or any later ruler, for that matter) that matches all these boxes :-D. ANTONINVS AVG PIVS P P TR P XII - Laureate head of Antoninus Pius right /COS IIII S C - Aequitas standing left, holding scales and cornucopiaeSestertius, Rome AD 14833 mm / 27,2 gRIC 855; BMCRE 1823; Banti 100 (53 specimens) Let´s see your coins of Antoninus Pius or Sestertii that come close to this in terms of quality control ! 10 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Limes Posted December 10, 2022 · Supporter Share Posted December 10, 2022 Nice addition! And that;s a great portrait indeed! 1 hour ago, Julius Germanicus said: it's weight is also 100 % spot on: exactly 27,2 grams equaling one roman ounce, the nominal weight of a Sestertius! Dont want to be negative here, but would the original coin, without corrosion on the reverse, weigh more? I think that the wear/pitting also made the coin lighter? I have two AP sestertii. Both nicely round, good portraits, but the weight is off. The reverse of the IMPERATOR II type is a bit corroded too. 7 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roman Collector Posted December 10, 2022 · Patron Share Posted December 10, 2022 (edited) Fun coin, @Julius Germanicus! That bare orichalcum gives us an idea of what these sestertii looked like back in the mid-second century when they were in circulation. You're right that it's an oddball. Most sestertii of the period weighed 23-27 g and had squarish flans. Here are a couple of my better-preserved Antoninus Pius sestertii. Antoninus Pius, AD 138-161. Roman orichalcum sestertius, 23.16 g, 29 mm. Rome, AD 142. Obv: ANTONINVS AVG PIVS P P TR P COS III, laureate head right. Rev: ANNONA AVG S C, Annona standing right, between modius and prow, holding corn ears and out-turned cornucopiae. Refs: RIC 597; BMCRE 1228; Cohen 37; RCV 4147; UCR 502. Antoninus Pius, AD 138-161. Roman orichalcum sestertius, 23.46 g, 32.3 mm, 12 h. Rome, December 159 - December 160. Obv: ANTONINVS AVG PIVS P P TR P XXIII, laureate head, right. Rev: PIETATI AVG COS IIII, Pietas, standing facing, head left, holding globe in extended right hand and child on left arm; on either side of her, small girl standing, raising one hand. Refs: RIC 1031; BMCRE 2088-90; Cohen 621; Strack 1192; RCV 4205. Notes:RIC 1002 and BMCRE 2062 are misdescribed by Mattingly in both RIC3 and BMCRE4. It is extremely doubtful that any specimens read TR P XXII on obv., but actually read TR P XXIII with the final "I" being merged with the neck truncation. Edited December 10, 2022 by Roman Collector 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shanxi Posted December 10, 2022 · Supporter Share Posted December 10, 2022 (edited) @Julius Germanicus Nice coin, but originally the weight was not "Spot On". The many corrosion holes certainly mean a loss of weight. Was the weight control „al pezzo“ or „al marco“ for these Sestertii??? The few sestertii I own are mostly below 27.2 g, but there are exemptions, e.g. this with 28g: Faustina II Sestertius, AD 161-175 Obv.: FAVSTINA AVGVSTA, draped bust right. Rev.: TEMPOR FELIC, Faustina standing left, holding two infants, between four girls at her feet. In field, S – C. AE, 28.05g, 33.4 mm Ref.: RIC 1673 Edited December 10, 2022 by shanxi 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaniard Posted December 10, 2022 · Supporter Share Posted December 10, 2022 @Julius Germanicus..Lovely obverse portrait.... My heaviest Sestertius of Antoninus Pius is the same type as @Roman Collector's sweet example.. ANTONINUS PIUS. 138-161 AD. Æ Sestertius (33mm, 26.75 g.) Struck 159/160 AD. Obverse..ANTONINVS AVG PIVS P P TR P XXIII, laureate head right Rev. PIETATI AVG COS IIII SC, Pietas standing left holding globe, Faustina Junior as Pietas standing left, between Faustina Minima, Lucilla & holding baby Fadilla. RIC III 1031 And here's one of his lovely Empress. Diva Faustina Senior. Æ Sestertius (32mm, 21.19 g.) Rome mint, struck under Antoninus Pius, circa AD 146-161. Obv. DIVA FAVSTINA draped bust right. Rev. AETERNITAS S-C seated left, holding scepter and globe surmounted by phoenix....RICIII #1103 (Antoninus Pius) Reddish-brown patina. 7 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Kowsky Posted December 10, 2022 · Member Share Posted December 10, 2022 3 hours ago, Julius Germanicus said: This was a "back to the roots" purchase for me: a nice big yellow Sestertius that cost me just 5 % of what I paid for my Agrippina Junior and nevertheless is much nicer in hand - the reverse has suffered from corrosion, but the obverse leaves little to be desired I think!Note that the roman mint never reached this level of quality control for AE coinage again: this coin is not only round, well struck, and obviously made of "pure" yellow Orichalcum, it's weight is also 100 % spot on: exactly 27,2 grams equaling one roman ounce, the nominal weight of a Sestertius! Show me a coin of Marcus Aurelius (or any later ruler, for that matter) that matches all these boxes :-D. ANTONINVS AVG PIVS P P TR P XII - Laureate head of Antoninus Pius right /COS IIII S C - Aequitas standing left, holding scales and cornucopiaeSestertius, Rome AD 14833 mm / 27,2 gRIC 855; BMCRE 1823; Banti 100 (53 specimens) Let´s see your coins of Antoninus Pius or Sestertii that come close to this in terms of quality control ! J.G. Your sestertius & the other examples posted on this thread prove that portrait engraving was at a very high level at the Rome mint during the 2nd century AD 😊. During the 3rd century AD portrait engraving was still at a very high level 😉. A favorite in my collection is posted below. Maximus as Caesar, AD 236-238. Rome Mint. AE Sestertius: 26.39 gm, 31 mm, 12 h. Obverse: Maximus draped & facing right. Reverse: Maximus holding baton & transverse spear, two standards behind him. RIC 13. Ex CNG 70, lot 1044, 2005; Ex Munzen & Medaillen GmbH 9, lot 638, 2001. 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.