Jump to content

Olivernumismatic

Member
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Olivernumismatic's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • One Month Later
  • Week One Done
  • First Post
  • Conversation Starter

Recent Badges

4

Reputation

  1. The back of the coin is the only thing that arises some suspicion, below the ‘64’ in the date their is a mark that seems like the aftermath of tooling.
  2. It’s considered a pattern countermarking, instead of using up money on new metals to strike they would countermark patterns on pre-existing coins. With that said, it is a type coin. I still seek to know it’s authenticity.
  3. The diameter and weight are a little under but it looks fine. https://www.ebay.com/itm/394972922318?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-127632-2357-0&ssspo=plkRNlwRRl2&sssrc=4429486&ssuid=RaNu65G_TWW&var=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY
×
×
  • Create New...