Marsyas Mike Posted September 21 · Member Share Posted September 21 I recently bought an unattributed batch of mixed Greek and Roman ancients that has been a lot of fun figuring out. The first dozen I attributed, with some effort in some cases. But this one has me stumped. Just glancing at it, the style seems very Kushan to me. Or possibly Thrace, part of the Augustus-Rhoemetalces series of two-and-three-headed AEs? Or Indo-Scythian, Indo-Greek, Bactrian? But this one is just not matching up to anything I've seen online, acsearch, etc. It is 17 mm diameter and 2.35 grams. The inscription looks kinda Greek, kinda not (Kharoshti?). Any help greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nerosmyfavorite68 Posted September 21 · Member Share Posted September 21 I'm not a provincial expert but it reminds me of the Anatolian issues with Demos/the Senate. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marsyas Mike Posted September 21 · Member Author Share Posted September 21 Just now, Nerosmyfavorite68 said: I'm not a provincial expert but it reminds me of the Anatolian issues with Demos/the Senate. Ha! Yes is does! I had not thought of that - thank you for the suggestion. Sometimes when I research these, I go into a kind of feedback loop that I have trouble getting out of. I will look into this. Thanks again @Nerosmyfavorite68 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shanxi Posted September 21 · Supporter Share Posted September 21 (edited) Not Demos, Roma (turreted) and Senate. You can read ..ΛΗΤΟ.. (ϹΥΝΚΛΗΤΟϹ) behind Senate. The Ω behind Roma is in the same position as the Ω in (ΘΕΑ)(Ν) (ΡΩ) ΕΡΜΟΚΑΠΗΛ(Ε)ΙΤ(Ω)(Ν) on this coin from Hermocapelia. Not much, I know. https://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/coin/328016 Edited September 21 by shanxi 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marsyas Mike Posted September 21 · Member Author Share Posted September 21 36 minutes ago, shanxi said: Not Demos, Roma (turreted) and Senate. You can read ..ΛΗΤΟ.. (ϹΥΝΚΛΗΤΟϹ) behind Senate. The Ω behind Roma is in the same position as the Ω in (ΘΕΑ)(Ν) (ΡΩ) ΕΡΜΟΚΑΠΗΛ(Ε)ΙΤ(Ω)(Ν) on this coin from Hermocapelia. Not much, I know. https://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/coin/328016 This is a much closer match than I was coming up with - many thanks @shanxi This gets me closer, I'm certain! (And no, I've never heard of Hermocapelia). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marsyas Mike Posted September 21 · Member Author Share Posted September 21 1 hour ago, shanxi said: Not Demos, Roma (turreted) and Senate. You can read ..ΛΗΤΟ.. (ϹΥΝΚΛΗΤΟϹ) behind Senate. The Ω behind Roma is in the same position as the Ω in (ΘΕΑ)(Ν) (ΡΩ) ΕΡΜΟΚΑΠΗΛ(Ε)ΙΤ(Ω)(Ν) on this coin from Hermocapelia. Not much, I know. https://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/coin/328016 Yep, I think you solved it. Mine seems to match this one a bit better, but from same place, same design (mine seems to have the monogram before the bust) - I couldn't have done it without you, @shanxi (and so much for my Kushan, etc. theories!). The legends on these (via RPC, acsearch) are kind of blundered, so matching the inscriptions seems unlikely for my poor specimen, but I do think this is it: Volume: III №: 1879 Reign: Uncertain City: Hermocapelia Region: Lydia Province: Asia (conventus of Pergamum) Denomination: Æ (18 mm) Average weight: 3.06 g. Issue: First half of the second century Obverse: ΕΡΜΟΚΑΠΗΛΙΤΩΝ; turreted and draped bust of Roma, right; in front, monogram Reverse: ΘΕΟΝ ϹΥΝΚΛΗΤΟΝ; draped bust of the Senate, right Reference: BMC 11–12 corr. Specimens: 14 https://rpc.ashmus.ox.ac.uk/coins/3/1879 Thanks again @shanxi and @Nerosmyfavorite68. I appreciate the help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anaximander Posted September 21 · Member Share Posted September 21 Good detective work. My reference (Dane Kurth, GRPC Lydia) shows the RPC III 1879 specimen. Same photo, just smaller. There is a similar type: Roma/Senate with ΘEA or ΘEAN on obverse. RPC III ref. #1877. And here are some more monograms associated with the type Roma/Senate without ΘEA or ΘEAN on obverse. Do I discern monogram 25 or 28 on your coin? SNG Copenhagen V (Lydia) has #163-167 as Time of Hadrian, of which #167 has the VTAB monogram. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marsyas Mike Posted September 21 · Member Author Share Posted September 21 (edited) 33 minutes ago, Anaximander said: Good detective work. My reference (Dane Kurth, GRPC Lydia) shows the RPC III 1879 specimen. Same photo, just smaller. There is a similar type: Roma/Senate with ΘEA or ΘEAN on obverse. RPC III ref. #1877. And here are some more monograms associated with the type Roma/Senate without ΘEA or ΘEAN on obverse. Do I discern monogram 25 or 28 on your coin? SNG Copenhagen V (Lydia) has #163-167 as Time of Hadrian, of which #167 has the VTAB monogram. Thank you so much for this additional information @Anaximander. I noticed that there were a lot of monograms for this type, but couldn't find any rundown on them. I'm much obliged! I'm thinking 28 is the monogram - but 26 could be possible, if the legend lettering is running into the monogram, making the "A" look more like an "N." Mine is in such poor shape it is hard to tell. Edited September 21 by Marsyas Mike Monogram sleuthing effort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.