ominus1 Posted September 17 · Patron Share Posted September 17 (edited) i removed the thread of my latest Habsburg(?) purchase for lack of prove that is was of Rudolf l (plus errors i made in the description 9_9) ...im still waiting for the seller to return from holiday to show me his proof (that i asked for when i purchased it)...so i been lQQking around for proof meself and found this.....is it proof enough....what do you think?... (the 2nd coin on the right is of Ottokar ll) Rudolf Habsburg l, (1276-1281) Edited September 18 by ominus1 errors 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ominus1 Posted September 17 · Patron Author Share Posted September 17 ...ah, thank you @Edessa..i'll take that as a 'yes' 🙂 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ominus1 Posted September 17 · Patron Author Share Posted September 17 ...and @Hrefn rings in with an astounding YES! thank you very much Friend! i'm feeling better all the time about the coin now...^^ 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marsyas Mike Posted September 18 · Member Share Posted September 18 Not exactly a "yes" since I don't know anything about these. But it is a handsome coin, Rudolph or not. 😀 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ominus1 Posted September 18 · Patron Author Share Posted September 18 ...and @Marsyas Mike rngs in with a + i'll 2 minutes ago, Marsyas Mike said: Not exactly a "yes" since I don't know anything about these. But it is a handsome coin, Rudolph or not. 😀 well thank you MM...we're matching pictures here of the 1st coin and my coin...i do believe they are a match with some damage to mine knocking our some letters but the others appear to be in sync....:) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romismatist Posted September 18 · Member Share Posted September 18 Definitely the same obverse. I wouldn't say that there's damage to your specimen, as pfennigs of this era often display this type of angular flat-struck treatment. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ominus1 Posted September 18 · Patron Author Share Posted September 18 1 hour ago, Romismatist said: Definitely the same obverse. I wouldn't say that there's damage to your specimen, as pfennigs of this era often display this type of angular flat-struck treatment. ..good point..it may have been made that way because both have a different number from the CNA catalog according to the references given on the descriptions...:)..thanks for your input.. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.