Topcat7 Posted November 16 · Member Share Posted November 16 (edited) Using @catadc 's guidance I believe this to be John III, S. 2096 var., but I am seeking confirmation of this so if anyone can help, I would appreciate that. TIA Edited November 16 by Topcat7 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benefactor Simon Posted November 16 · Benefactor Benefactor Share Posted November 16 I just checked Labarum , i am traveling so that is all i have access to, this coin does not match SBCV-2096 assuming the one example in Labarum is correct. @catadc has a great eye for detail, so perhaps Labrum is incorrect or he is seeing something I am missing. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nerosmyfavorite68 Posted November 16 · Member Share Posted November 16 I'm not an expert on post-1204 stuff, and I'm a little rusty on base trachea. However, size and more importantly, weight would probably help. I have the pdf version of Sear Byzantine so I can look more easily. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nerosmyfavorite68 Posted November 16 · Member Share Posted November 16 What about Sear 2031 or 32? Sadly, there's no picture. The plate coin a couple numbers down has more of the 'fat face' Christ, kind of like this one. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catadc Posted November 16 · Member Share Posted November 16 Unfortunately, my "eye for detail" is totally blind when talking trachea; these are totally out of my interest zone. If tagging people, maybe @TheTrachyEnjoyer could help? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zimm Posted November 16 · Member Share Posted November 16 I believe the coin is likely an imitation of Sear 2003, Isaac II (or an official issue in very poor style). If you look closely, you can make out the Virgin seated on a throne on the obverse, and the emperor holding an akakia and a cruciform sceptre on the reverse. 2 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTrachyEnjoyer Posted November 16 · Member Share Posted November 16 I agree with Zimm. The imperial regalia seems much too crude to be official. That in combination with obverse would lend this towards being one of the (many) contemporary issac II copies 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.