seth77 Posted June 16, 2023 · Member Posted June 16, 2023 (edited) This one came in my June order: AE26mm 12.85g orichalcum unit (as?), minted at Caesarea, ca. March 222(?) [ΑΥ] Κ Μ ΑΥΡΗΛI ΑΛƐΞΑΝΔ; bare-headed and draped bust of Severus Alexander, r., seen from rear; countermark ΜΗΤΡΟΠ ΚΑΙϹΑΡ; ƐΤ Ɛ; agalma of Mount Argaeus on altar inscribed with regnal year RPC VI 6728, Ganschow 733e-f This coin with the unlikely obverse legend is likely minted around the changing of the regime from Elagabal to Alexander in March 222. It gives Alexander the titulature of 'autokrator' (emperor) instead of 'kaisar' (Caesar), while the effigy is bareheaded, specific to the issues minted for him as Caesar and the reverse marks the fifth year (ƐΤ Ɛ) of Elagabal's reign. This can mean that an obverse die was hastily modified for the new political reality, before changing the bust type or the reverses minted for Elagabal. The countermark is unrecorded in Howgego, but known for the coinage of Severus Alexander as Caesar, see here for analogy. It seems that I have steadily been building a small collection of Alexander as Caesar provincial issues. Edited June 16, 2023 by seth77 19 Quote
expat Posted June 16, 2023 · Supporter Posted June 16, 2023 Nice patina and interesting obv and rev. Nice addition to your collection. Quote
seth77 Posted June 16, 2023 · Member Author Posted June 16, 2023 There is practically no patina, just the somewhat toned brassy metal. 8 Quote
expat Posted June 16, 2023 · Supporter Posted June 16, 2023 The difference background and lighting makes Quote
Severus Alexander Posted June 16, 2023 · Supporter Posted June 16, 2023 How odd! It makes me wonder if there was a short time before the assassination of Elagabalus where Sev Alex was raised to the rank of junior Augustus… 1 Quote
seth77 Posted June 17, 2023 · Member Author Posted June 17, 2023 10 hours ago, Severus Alexander said: How odd! It makes me wonder if there was a short time before the assassination of Elagabalus where Sev Alex was raised to the rank of junior Augustus… Either that or some degree of uncertainty regarding who the current emperor is. 1 Quote
seth77 Posted July 25, 2023 · Member Author Posted July 25, 2023 A new more regular Alexander as Caesar from Caesarea Cappadocia, this time with the full Caesar epigraphy of Κ Μ ΑΥΡΗΛΙΟϹ ΑΛƐΞΑΝΔΡΟϹ: Without the countermark to block his face, this one has a rather pleasing effigy of the young Alexander and a nice thick and shiny patina. 8 Quote
ominus1 Posted July 26, 2023 · Patron Posted July 26, 2023 ...i believe we had agreed in a pow-wow some time back these to be of Severus Alexander from Cappadocia (one with countermark too :))...i love the reverses of that place on coins 6 Quote
Roman Collector Posted July 26, 2023 · Patron Posted July 26, 2023 This is the only Severus Alexander I have from this mint and here he has the titulature of an emperor. Severus Alexander, 222-235 CE. Roman Provincial AE 25.0 mm, 10.37 g. Cappadocia, Caesarea, 222/3 CE. Obv: ΑV Κ Μ ΑVΡ ϹЄΟΥ ΑΛЄΞΑΝΔΡ, laureate head, right; uncertain c/m behind. Rev: ΜΗΤΡΟΠ ΚΑΙϹΑΡΙ, agalma of Mount Argaeus surmounted by star, atop altar inscribed ЄTA (= year 1). Refs: RPC VI 6735; Sydenham 537-38; BMC 298; SNG von Aulock 6510. 7 Quote
seth77 Posted March 28 · Member Author Posted March 28 (edited) Here is a clear rendition of the obverse legend (although worn) with the title of Autokrator very visible: Α Κ Μ ΑΥΡΗΛΙ ΑΛΕΞΑΝΔ -- and the radiate Helios in the countermark very well preserved. This coinage with this legend can only be after early January 222. And two bonuses: 1. another more regular Alexander as Caesar, earlier emission K Μ ΑΥΡΗΛIOC ΑΛƐΞΑΝΔPOC, obverse die-match with my coin #2 above: 2. An Elagabal with an interesting and scarce military bust, struck post the wedding of 219 with Julia Paula All three have the same GIC12i counter mark, radiate head of Helios r. inside circular punch mark, likely applied under Gordian III or later. Edited March 28 by seth77 2 Quote
JAZ Numismatics Posted March 28 · Member Posted March 28 On 6/16/2023 at 4:21 PM, seth77 said: This can mean that an obverse die was hastily modified for the new political reality, before changing the bust type or the reverses minted for Elagabal. This is probably the most likely explanation. The bust on that die is well-done. Why waste it? Just call him emperor in the legend and add the headgear on the next die. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.