Jump to content

New to Greek coins - is this Philip II of Macedon tetradrachm genuine?


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I recently won the pictured coin at the most recent Spink auction, and after taking a further look, I'm a bit concerned about three details:

  1. The coin is slightly underweight at 14.04g (vs. the standard of ~14.40g)
  2. There is noticeable pitting all over the obverse
  3. What looks like a seam from 10 to 11 o'clock on the obverse

With that in mind, what do the fine people of Numisforums think of this coin? 

 

Edited by quercus
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)

I am certainly not an expert in this area, but nothing about the coin screams fake to me. That's a very nice portrait of Zeus on the obverse!

Edit to add: Welcome to the Forum! 🙂 

Edited by CPK
  • Like 3
Posted
6 minutes ago, CPK said:

I am certainly not an expert in this area, but nothing about the coin screams fake to me. That's a very nice portrait of Zeus on the obverse!

Edit to add: Welcome to the Forum! 🙂 

Thank you for the welcome! I've mainly been focusing on Roman coins these past 2-3 years, so this is a new arena for me. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I was a bit suspicious of this one too since there's loads of fakes in this Spink auction and the coin is covered in a fairly think patina making it difficult to assess some of the surfaces. But if I remember correctly, it did obverse die match with examples that Le Rider had catalogued. I think the reference was Le Rider pl.45 22, you can find some here. That's not fullproof of course, it could be a transfer die, but perhaps best start by going through those examples and comparing the Spink coin to them to look for weird similarities or differences. For starters, there's 7 other examples with a weight between 14.00g and 14.10g so that's more reassuring.

Edited by Kaleun96
  • Like 2
Posted

Spink is a very old and a very good firm. However even the best can get fooled by forgeries. I do not like to comment on authenticity based on photographs. There are simply too many things that can be hidden. For what it is worth like @CPK I see nothing wrong with the coin. However the coin is posthumous struck during the reign of Antipater-Kassander 323-315 BC Troxell 303 Le Rider Amphipolis III 22  Your weight is a bit light but not overtly so. Some coins in the very broad group can b under 14 grams weight and weights in the 14.10 are not uncommon. 

  • Like 2
Posted
8 hours ago, Kaleun96 said:

since there's loads of fakes in this Spink auction

I was fairly careful with the 2  I bid on and won,  but am now worried!  Please spill the beans.

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, ewomack said:

I do not see a coin picture in the first post. Was it removed?

Oops, I just realized I accidentally removed it while editing the original post. 

 

 

Edited by quercus
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I spent a few moments doing some acsearch sleuthing as @Kaleun96recommended. I did find a Le Rider plate die match for both the obverse and reverse (thank you for the helpful reference). I've attached a quick obverse die match study I put together on Photoshop, alongside the coin with matching die (2003 Busso Peus). I didn't bother doing a reverse die match study on Photoshop because the die match is obvious.

Although as he mentioned, the question of whether this may be a transfer die also remains. 

Edited by quercus
  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...