Gavin Richardson Posted December 26, 2022 · Member Posted December 26, 2022 (edited) Just recently reading on the Anglo-Saxon Harpole Treasure, which includes a necklace partially made up of "Roman coins." I could not find details beyond the popular press article. Can anyone identify the coins? They look Byzantine to me. Apologies if there's a thread on this already. I searched "Harpole" and did not turn up anything. https://www.cnn.com/style/article/gold-necklace-harpole-treasure-female-burial-scn/index.html Edited December 26, 2022 by Gavin Richardson 6 Quote
AussieCollector Posted December 26, 2022 · Member Posted December 26, 2022 The coins almost look like Valens solidi, minted in Trier. But not quite. 1 1 Quote
DLTcoins Posted December 26, 2022 · Member Posted December 26, 2022 (edited) My impression is that they are imitations of solidi from the joint reign of Justin I and Justinian. I wrote to a member of the team several weeks ago asking if better photos were available but received a disappointing canned response. The necklace dates to just the time when coins were coming back into monetary use in Britain after the coinless 'dark age'. Edited December 26, 2022 by DLTcoins 3 Quote
Gavin Richardson Posted December 27, 2022 · Member Author Posted December 27, 2022 Interesting. I wonder in what context the imitations were produced. On the continent? Or in Anglo-Saxon England? I wish you had gotten a more generous response. That does not seem to be a hard question. Quote
TheTrachyEnjoyer Posted December 27, 2022 · Member Posted December 27, 2022 (edited) http://www.yorkcoins.com/early_anglo-saxon_thrymsa.htm This type is known from thrymsa imitations. The gratian original A very crude imitation. I imagine the above coins are somewhere in between these two As for the Constantine issue theory, I dont recall many Constantinople 5th century coins being found in Anglo Saxon england (I could be wrong on that, I dont have my hoard books on hand at the moment to verify). Rather, Merovingian/Frankish/Frisian coinage is what most often made it to the continent, these usually being an imitation of some roman or Byzantine coin. (On a sidenote, You can even see the Angel between the two emperors on the imitation, thus eliminating the Justinian and Justin imitation theory) Edited December 27, 2022 by TheTrachyEnjoyer 6 1 Quote
Hrefn Posted December 27, 2022 · Supporter Posted December 27, 2022 Here is a Valens solidus REV from Trier which is very similar, but the emperors are not nimbate. I notice the legends on the Hartlepool coins are retrograde. This could be because the photo has been reversed. Or, the legends truly are retrograde. I think the coins all came from the same die as well. Three solidi from the same die, with reversed legends, would argue strongly for locally produced imitations. Here is a contemporary solidus of Valentinian II with nimbate emperors, but from Milan. 6 Quote
TheTrachyEnjoyer Posted December 27, 2022 · Member Posted December 27, 2022 14 minutes ago, Hrefn said: but the emperors are not nimbate. I believe this is a crude rendition of the angel above, not a nimbate feature on the hoard coins 1 1 Quote
Hrefn Posted December 27, 2022 · Supporter Posted December 27, 2022 3 minutes ago, TheTrachyEnjoyer said: I believe this is a crude rendition of the angel above, not a nimbate feature on the hoard coins I believe you are correct. 2 Quote
DLTcoins Posted December 27, 2022 · Member Posted December 27, 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, TheTrachyEnjoyer said: http://www.yorkcoins.com/early_anglo-saxon_thrymsa.htm This type is known from thrymsa imitations. The gratian original A very crude imitation. I imagine the above coins are somewhere in between these two As for the Constantine issue theory, I dont recall many Constantinople 5th century coins being found in Anglo Saxon england (I could be wrong on that, I dont have my hoard books on hand at the moment to verify). Rather, Merovingian/Frankish/Frisian coinage is what most often made it to the continent, these usually being an imitation of some roman or Byzantine coin. (On a sidenote, You can even see the Angel between the two emperors on the imitation, thus eliminating the Justinian and Justin imitation theory) This does make more sense in terms of prototypes available in 7th century Britain. Between the mid-5th century Patching Hoard and the early 7th century finds from Sutton Hoo and Crondall, there is little evidence for coin importation into Britain. Has anyone seen images of the Harpole obverses (if they have obverses)? Edited December 27, 2022 by DLTcoins 1 Quote
Benefactor DonnaML Posted December 27, 2022 · Benefactor Benefactor Posted December 27, 2022 The necklace is certainly interesting, but if I had the opportunity to select one ancient object made with gold coins, I think I might choose this offering bowl from the Berthouville Treasure! 4 2 Quote
Gavin Richardson Posted December 29, 2022 · Member Author Posted December 29, 2022 I agree that the reverse iconography of the solidus is close. I also see some similarities, though, in the reverse lettering to this follis of Justin II and Sophia. 5 Quote
AussieCollector Posted December 29, 2022 · Member Posted December 29, 2022 1 hour ago, Gavin Richardson said: I agree that the reverse iconography of the solidus is close. I also see some similarities, though, in the reverse lettering to this follis of Justin II and Sophia. Nice pickup and agreed. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.