Edessa Posted August 28, 2022 · Supporter Share Posted August 28, 2022 I have not been able to track this one down or form a firm opinion. The flan appears to be Provencial and is a good two mm thick. The legends appear to be Imperial. It does have the appearance of a casting seam, but this selection of attributes is a bit strange. I paid a huge $7 for this back in 2001, so no great financial loss if it needs to go into the black cabinet. The picture is not great, but the circular area at Securitas' feet is a countermark with an eagle. AE 18, 5.48g, 6h Obv: IVLIA AVGUSTA(?) Rev: SECVRIT IMP... Any thoughts? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shanxi Posted August 29, 2022 · Supporter Share Posted August 29, 2022 (edited) A casting seam indicates that this is one of the common ancient white metal forgeries falsely called Limes denarii. I can read *ECV* on the reverse . FECVNDITAS ? SECVRIT... ? The obverse and the reverse of these castings do not necessarily have to belong together. It could be a Domna obverse and e.g. a Caracalla reverse like this: https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=4567579 Edited August 29, 2022 by shanxi 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roman Collector Posted August 29, 2022 · Patron Share Posted August 29, 2022 14 minutes ago, shanxi said: A casting seam indicates that this is one of the common ancient white metal forgeries falsely called Limes denarii. I can read *ECV* on the reverse . FECVNDITAS ? SECVRIT... ? The obverse and the reverse of these castings do not necessarily have to belong together. It could be a Domna obverse and e.g. a Caracalla reverse like this: https://www.acsearch.info/search.html?id=4567579 I agree with the "limes denarius" explanation. These coins are sometimes heavier and thicker than their official counterparts because they are cast. Here's one of Faustina II with a reverse type of Marcus Aurelius used years earlier. It's cast -- notice how the "flan crack" on the obverse doesn't go all the way through the flan. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edessa Posted August 29, 2022 · Supporter Author Share Posted August 29, 2022 Thanks to both of you! That combination certainly makes the most sense. I am just not familiar with Limes denarii that are over 5g and on such a thick flan. And countermarked to boot. This coin must have had an interesting travel history. The only other Limes Denarius that I have is much more conventional. Caracalla, as Caesar, AD 196-198. Æ Limes Denarius (17mm, 3.35g, 12h). cf. Rome mint. Struck AD 196-197. Obv: M AVR ANTONINVS CAES; Bare headed and draped bust right. Rev: SPEI PERPETVAE; Spes advancing left, holding flower and raising hem of skirt. Ref: cf. RIC IV 5; cf. RSC 594. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.